I love the "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner" tradition ...
whether real or imagined, the idea of having specific men and women across the
table from you creates fascinating scenarios. So in honor of the holiday, I wonder
what it would be like if Saint Valentine came to dinner at No41.
After introductions at the door, I'd start with the obvious tour
of modern-day appliances and technology. Since Val (which he insists I call him though
it seems very disrespectful) was martyred for his faith back in the third
century, he probably isn't up on all the contemporary world has to offer. What
Pandora station would he prefer? Gregorian chant? A little after his time but
probably more familiar than Mumford and Sons. I'd probably stick with a simple
"meat and vegetables" kind of meal to put my time-traveling guest at
ease, accompanied by a bottle of Chianti (from his supposed country of origin).
What I know of Val is insubstantial. There are many legends
surrounding his life, none of which have been authenticated with any accuracy.
He was likely a bishop in the early church, when it was under intense
persecution from the Roman Empire. There's a story of his being arrested for
marrying Christian couples. There's also a story of a judge asking him to
restore the sight of his blind daughter; the miracle was followed by the
conversion of the family to the Christian faith. Some storytellers have added
an epilogue to the scene - that upon leaving, he sent a note to the daughter
signed "Your Valentine". I bet if I brought that up to my guest he
would become flustered and adamantly deny any such action. Or perhaps he is a
romantic after all.
Regardless, the romantic associations of my guest were attached
to him by another era. When "courtly love" became popular in 14th
century England, a poet by the name of Chaucer associated Val with another
romantic tradition due to the dating of my saint's official feast day, and the
rest is holiday history. In the 18th century, our current tradition of sending
"valentines" (Val is impressed that his name is now a widely-accepted
noun) came into practice and has grown ever since (proving that we can't blame
Hallmark for inventing a holiday to increase sales! They just capitalize on
it.)
So after some small talk about the worldwide Christian church and
the state of online dating (because the best dinner conversations meander
between important and inconsequential topics), I'd ask him how he feels about
joining the ranks of his 3rd century peer Saint Nicholas and his 5th century
brother Saint Patrick as the figurehead of a holiday tradition. "I don't
really know what to think of it," he would muse. "My life was so
small. The Lord gave me a flock to care for. He provided me with courage when
my life could be used for His glory. He has given me good rest. I can't fathom
a world where my name is synonymous with red roses and glittery paper cards.
Nicholas and I got the better deal though. Our holidays are usually toasted
with mulled wine and champagne, not cheap beer."
A saint with a sense of humor.
"Love isn't an undesirable legacy to be associated
with," he would continue. "My forerunner, the blessed Apostle John,
called himself by the moniker 'the disciple whom Jesus loved'. The Apostle
wasn't boasting; he was claiming an identity, one which we may also live by.
Eros love, philia love, it's all possible because of the love God lavishes on
mankind and models for us. It's extraordinary really. No love that we could
celebrate on this day is greater."
A good word from my saintly dinner guest.
A good word from my saintly dinner guest.
No comments:
Post a Comment